From Colonialism to Racketeering: 

Read our editorial on why the U.S. must keep its hands off Greenland

Part 1: The Mechanics of Planetary Motion

Chapter 1: The Viscous Drag – The Eternal Chase of the Magnetic Pole

To comprehend the true history of our planet and the massive climatic shifts it has endured—specifically the anomaly of the Ice Age affecting Europe so intensely—we must first dismantle a common misconception: the idea that the Earth moves through space as a single, perfectly synchronized solid unit. To see the truth of the Greenland Pivot, we must learn to distinguish between the two primary invisible lines that pierce our globe: the Spinning Pole (the geographic axis of rotation) and the Geomagnetic North Pole.

Standard geological models and textbook diagrams have long puzzled over the erratic, wandering movements of the Geomagnetic North Pole. Scientists often treat it as a "random walk," a wandering spirit that dances whimsically and unpredictably around the stable geographic axis due to chaotic storms deep within the planet. However, this book proposes a fundamental inversion of that understanding. We posit that the Geomagnetic Pole is indeed moving, but it is not moving randomly, and it is certainly not leading the dance. It is following it.

The Geomagnetic North Pole is trapped in a state of perpetual catchup, hunting for a Spinning Pole that is never able to be there at the same time. The magnetic signature of our planet is always a ghost of the past, pointing not to where the Earth spins now, but to where it was spinning then.

The root of this disconnect lies in the distinct physical properties of the Earth’s deep layers. The Earth's magnetic field is generated by the geodynamo—the complex, churning movement of molten iron and nickel alloys in the outer core, thousands of kilometers beneath our feet. This generation process creates a dipole, a north and a south. However, the medium in which this dipole exists is not light or thin.

If the interior of the Earth flowed like water, the magnetic pole would be nimble. Water is a substance of low viscosity; it reacts almost instantly to changes in container shape or rotation. If the Earth were a glass sphere filled with water, and the crust shifted its spin, the water inside would align with the new rotational axis immediately. The magnetic north would snap to the true north without hesitation, and they would be virtually identical.

But the flows in the Earth's molten cores are "tough." They do not behave like water. We must compare the movement of the core instead to heavy, cold honey, dense molasses, or even pitch. The viscosity—the internal resistance to flow—is tremendous. This "toughness" means that the core operates under different laws of time than the surface.

Imagine a large bucket suspended from a rope. If you fill it with water and spin it, the water creates a vortex, aligning with the center of rotation almost immediately. Now, imagine filling that same bucket with cold, thick honey. When you spin the bucket (representing the Earth’s crust changing its rotational axis due to ice build-up or weight shifts), the honey resists. It possesses massive inertia and significant internal friction. It takes a massive amount of accumulated energy and time to start the honey turning in the new direction.

Even more importantly, consider what happens if you tilt the bucket while it is already spinning. The water would adjust its surface and spin axis to the new angle quickly. The honey, however, would continue to churn in its original pattern, fighting the new angle for a long time before gravity and friction force it to correct itself.

This is the state of our core. As the Earth's Spinning Pole shifts its position due to critical weight balances on the crust—a shifting of the "bucket"—the Geomagnetic Pole attempts to realign with the new axis of rotation. However, because the flow is tough, viscous, and resistant to rapid change, it cannot snap into place.

Consequently, the Geomagnetic North Pole is not moving in a straight line toward the current Geographic Pole. It is on a perpetually corrected route. Every time it inches closer to the Spinning Pole, the Spinning Pole itself has likely moved slightly again due to new weight distributions (like melting ice or shifting water tables). The magnetic pole is constantly recalibrating, curving its path, trying to intercept a target that keeps changing position.

Therefore, the location where the Geomagnetic North Pole is found today is not an accident. It is a lagging indicator. The fact that for the last century, it was hovering near Greenland is not because of random magnetic storms, but because that is where the Spinning Pole was. The tough, honey-like flows of the core are still rotating around that ancient axis, struggling to shed the momentum of the last 100,000 years.

Discourse 1: The Physics of "Tough" Flows and Rotational Hysteresis

1.1 The Heavy Dog on a Leash: Visualizing Momentum

To visualize the relationship between the Earth's hard shell and its liquid interior without getting lost in abstract mathematics, we can use a mechanical analogy: walking a very large, heavy dog—like a St. Bernard—on a long leash. In this scenario, you represent the Earth's crust and the Spinning Pole, meaning the physical rotation axis. The dog represents the Geomagnetic Pole, which is the direction of the flow deep in the core.

As you walk in a straight line for a long time, the dog walks directly behind you. Everything is aligned, the leash is slack, and the path is clear. But consider what happens if you decide to change direction suddenly because the path changes—representing the shift in the Earth's crust due to ice melting or water shifts. You turn a sharp corner to the left, moving away from Greenland toward the Arctic Ocean.

Does the dog turn instantly with you? No. The dog is massive, heavy, and has its own forward momentum. The leash pulls tight. The dog takes several steps in the old direction before it feels the tug, realizes the direction has changed, and begins to curve its path toward where you are now. By the time the heavy dog actually catches up to your new path, you might have walked quite a distance or even turned again.

If a stranger were watching only the dog to figure out where you were going, they would be completely confused. The dog is pointing at where you were a minute ago. This is exactly what we see with the Geomagnetic North Pole.

For the last century, we have watched the Magnetic Pole hovering over the islands of Northern Canada and near the Nares Strait. Many scientists call this "random variation." Our hypothesis suggests it is not random. It is the heavy dog. It was hovering there because that is where the "master," the Spinning Pole, was standing for thousands of years during the Ice Age.

Now, we see the Magnetic Pole racing across the Arctic Ocean toward Siberia. Why? Because the "dog," the core, has finally overcome its inertia. The leash has pulled taut, and the core is running to catch up with the "master" which moved to the central Arctic thousands of years ago. The magnetic field is simply the shadow of the Earth's past orientation, frantically trying to update itself to the present.

1.2 Rheological Decoupling and the Hysteresis Loop

When we step back from the analogy and examine the geophysics, this hypothesis necessitates a re-evaluation of the coupling mechanisms between the lithosphere and mantle and the fluid outer core. We are essentially describing a massive "hysteresis loop" in the alignment of the magnetic dipole with the axis of rotation. Hysteresis is a phenomenon where the state of a system depends not just on its immediate environment, but on its history.

Standard geodynamo theory accepts that the Coriolis force, resulting from planetary rotation, organizes the helical convection columns in the outer core which generate the global magnetic field. Therefore, in a steady-state system where the rotation is constant for millions of years, the mean magnetic pole should theoretically coincide with the rotation pole, or vector Omega.

However, standard models often assume a response time, which we call Delta-T, that is negligible on geological time scales. We propose that the Reynolds number of the core fluid, combined with the effective "magnetic viscosity"—a product of electromagnetic induction and fluid drag—creates a significant temporal lag. We are dealing with a fluid that acts as a low-viscosity medium for chemical convection but a high-viscosity medium for angular momentum re-orientation.

When True Polar Wander occurs—driven by changes in the principal inertia tensor of the Earth due to cryospheric loading or hydrological mass redistribution—the angular velocity vector Omega shifts relative to the crust. The crust and mantle reorient fairly rapidly to conserve angular momentum.

The core, however, is fluid but electromagnetically "stiff." The convection cells responsible for the dipole do not reorganize immediately. Instead, they preserve the angular momentum of the previous rotational state until the boundary coupling forces can overcome the inertial forces of the massive fluid body.

Consequently, the current position of the Geomagnetic North Pole is not an indicator of the current rotational axis stability, but rather an integration of the past rotational history. The magnetic vector M moves along an asymptotic approach toward the rotational vector Omega that it never fully achieves due to the constant fluctuations in the Earth’s mass balance. This lag provides us with the necessary forensic data to pinpoint the location of the Paleo-Spin Pole: central southern Greenland. The core is currently relaxing from that specific pre-Holocene stress state.